I recently got back from an international vacation. I don’t usually read in-flight magazines, but I spied a headline while my neighbor perused his that made me pick mine up. Evidently, according to CEO Richard Anderson’s editorial, Delta is “Flying Greener,” (in the January magazine.)

He highlights their efforts to be more energy efficient — laudable, but mostly profit-driven as fuel is a significant and volatile portion of airlines’ costs. My favorite misleading sentence reads,

“On average, our fleet performs at 55 passenger-miles per gallon, better than a hybrid car transporting one person.”

This may be true, but I wouldn’t drive the 4,936 miles (as calculated by TerraPass) round trip to San Jose, Costa Rica for a 10-day vacation — which is what I did with Delta’s assistance. Flying facilitates travel miles people would NEVER consider in a car. The airplane/hybrid comparison is a red herring.

Delta also shared that their emission reduction since 2000 is the equivalent of 19.5 million cars from our roads (who came up with that measure, anyway?). How much of that is reduced demand in the bad economy?

He concluded by identifying external bogeymen that prevent them from further reducing the environmental impacts of flying — the specter of emissions taxes, and the more justifiable outdated Air Traffic Control technology which he says requires inefficient traffic patterns.

Emissions taxes — which would be passed on to consumers — hold out the hope that increased costs of flying might encourage consumers to fly less frequently. And, I’m not an expert, but I can believe that updated Air Traffic Control could also produce improvements.

Flying is hard to give up — and anything that defies the laws of gravity is never going to be “green.” In the end, the most it can hope for is “less bad.”

Unbelievable. Dr. Seuss must be rolling in his grave. Three businessmen have hijacked the name of the Dr. Seuss environmentalist classic, “The Lorax” to greenwash a planned coal gasification and chemical plant: I bring you LoraxAg, “architects of clean technologies.”

It’s two-for-one: I’m offended both as an environmentalist and as an architect.

I am the Lorax and I speak for the… well, for the high sulfur coal…and synthetic fertilizer?

The company brochure (PDF) reads like a Twilight Zone version of the Dr. Seuss classic. Amid warm and fuzzy pictures of hands planting a seedling (and rail cars presumably full of ‘clean’ coal), the brochure boasts that the chemical plant will produce “ammonia, urea, and sulfuric acid” with “inexpensive high sulfur coal reserves” bringing “high paying, high skill jobs.”

Yeah, that definitely reminds me of the Lorax: The part about chopping down Truffula Trees and emitting Gloppity Glop and Schloppity Schlop in order to provide jobs for the Once-ler family. Guys, you’re not the Lorax. You’re Once-lers! ‘Once-ler-Ag’ would be a more fitting moniker, ‘architects of greenwash’

It’s barely February, and we already have a contender for greenwash of the year.

Sony recently released its spiffy new W mini series Vaio notebook which has a green keypad frame. I know. You would be reasonable to assume a green product — literally green — cannot be sustainably green. Well, in this case you would be pleasantly surprised to be wrong. (Photo via Sony)

The 2010 Consumer Electronic Show showcased hundreds of new products, all part of the worldwide crisis in e-waste that is hitting children and adults in developing countries hard with toxic trash’s health and pollution legacy. Many constituent parts of computers, when incinerated or otherwise handled at the end of their life, can turn into substances clearly linked with immune and reproductive disorders, birth defects, neurological damage and cancer.

Against this backdrop described by the Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxic Coalition in Exporting Harm, there are some positive developments in the design and manufacture of emerging electronics. Sony was an early leader in sustainable practices and recently elected to remove chlorine and bromine from computers as outlined in a recent report (PDF) by ChemSec (the International Chemical Secretariat) and Clean Production Action.

The W series Mini Vaio has some playful packaging features, such as a plastic enclosure made from 23% recycled CDs (must have been very bad music to not have even made the resale market!) and a carrying case from plastic bottles. It is lit with energy-sipping LEDs, and apparently reduces CO2 emissions by 10% (based on the innovative use of existing plastic products in its packaging and casing).

What was much more telling to me is the fact that it’s registered with EPEAT in addition to Energy Star 5.0 and RoHS (the European bad boy list of Restricted Hazardous Substances which includes lead, cadmium, and mercury among others). EPEAT is an acronym for Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool, and it makes Energy Star ® look like a coloring exercise. The standards contain 51 robust criteria and are light-years beyond merely energy considerations. Witnesseth: materials (heavy metals, plastics), design for end of life (to facilitate disassembly for future gadgets or other products), product longevity, energy, end of life management (the 800 lb gorilla), corporate performance (remember the product vs. whole company analysis?) and packaging are all considered in the registration process.

The US Electronics Industry has made great strides in product development but many companies are persistently stonewalling attempts to develop a US policy to develop a cogent end-of-life system called product stewardship. There are some companies that have take-back programs but the US infrastructure is still woefully inadequate to address what will only continue to be an international travesty and embarrassment. The world disposes (read that as “throws out”) 50 million tons of e-waste each year. Here is an incredible, missed opportunity to create hundreds of thousands of jobs across the US to develop a safe, responsible infrastructure to handle e-waste.

The EPA has a great site with information on e-waste management issues. In the meantime, support Sony’s and other efforts to refine and upgrade sustainable product design and help create positive pressure to address e-waste, one click, snap at a time.